Web survey bibliography (4086)

Page:

• 1
...
• 31
• 32
• 33
...
• 82

• Detecting Satisficing In Online Surveys: What we found ; 2012; Salifu, S.
• Challenges of assessing the quality of a prerecruited probability-based panel of internet users in...; 2012; Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L.
• Assessing Cross-National Equivalence of Measures of Xenophobia: Evidence from Probing in Web Surveys; 2012; Behr, D., Braun, M., Kaczmirek, L.
• Impact and the Research Excellence Framework: New challenges for universities; 2012; Grant, J.
• Impact of Fixed Choice Design on Blockmodeling Outcomes; 2012; Znidarsic, A.
• Panel Conditioning in Online Survey Panels: Problems of Increased Sophistication and Decreased Engagemeent...; 2012; Adams, A. N., Atkeson, L. R., Karp, J. A.
• Efficiency of Different Recruitment Strategies for Web Panels; 2012; Hansen, K. M., Pedersen, R. T.
• Understanding Mode Effects between Mobile Web and Mobile SMS Surveys; 2012; Poduska, B., Johnson, E. P.
• Paper-and-Pencil versus Web Administration of a Student Satisfaction Survey; 2012; Bowen, C.-C.
• Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience...; 2012; Adams, M. J. D., Umbach, P. D.
• Disfluencies and Gaze Aversion in Unreliable Responses to Survey Questions; 2012; Schober, M. F., Conrad, F. G., Dijkstra, W., Ongena, Y. P.
• Use of Paradata in a Responsive Design Framework to Manage a Field Data Collection; 2012; Wagner, J., West, B. T., Kirgis, N., Lepkowski, J. M., Axinn, W., Kruger-Ndiaye, S.
• Recruiting A Probability Sample For An Online Panel: Effects Of Contact Mode, Incentives, And Information...; 2012; Scherpenzeel, A., Toepoel, V.
• Do Questions about Watching Internet Pornography Make People Watch Internet Pornography? A Comparison...; 2012; Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M.
• “I think I know what you did last summer” Improving data quality in panel surveys; 2012; Lugtig, P. J.
• An Initial Look at Non-Response and Attrition in Understanding Society; 2012; Lynn, P., Burton, J., Kaminska, O., Knies, G., Nandi, A.
• Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 4: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2012; Burton, J., Budd, S., Kaminska, O., Uhrig, S. C. N., Brown, M., Calderwood, L.
• The Propensity of Older Respondents to Participate in a General Purpose Survey; 2012; Lynn, P.
• Mode-Switch Protocols: How a Seemingly Small Design Difference can affect Attrition Rates and Attrition...; 2012; Lynn, P.
• Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates?; 2012; Olson, K., Smyth, J. D., Wood, H.
• Adaptive web sampling in ecology; 2012; Thompson, S. K.
• Deep Data: Qualitative Approaches to E-Research in the Digital Age; 2012; Salmons, J.
• Going online with a face-to-face household panel: Initial results from an experiment on the UK Household...; 2012; Jaeckle, A., Lynn, P., Burton, J.
• Opportunities and Challenges for the Digital Researcher; 2012; Blank, G., Morey, Y.
• Measures of Data Quality Across the RDD Frames; 2012; Lavrakas, P. J.
• Reliable Online Social Network Data Collection; 2012; Abdesslem, F. B., Parris, I., Henderson, T.
• Statisticians don’t like non-probability; 2012; Murphy, J.
• Diasporas on the web: new networks, new methodologies; 2012; Crush, J., Eberhardt, C., Caesar, M., Chikanda, A., Pendleton, W., Hill, A.
• Not by the Book: Facebook as a Sampling Frame; 2012; Brickman Bhutta, C.
• Survey Quality Evaluation for Business Surveys; 2012; Biemer, P. P.
• Respondent-driven sampling; 2012; Schonlau, M., Liebau, E.
• Online Data Collection in the Agro-Food Sector; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
• Collecting data electronically from enterprises – searching for the right approach; 2012; Keating, J., Portillo, S.
• Tailoring the design of e-questionnaires to the response process: About audit trails and other methods...; 2012; Morren, M., Snijkers, G.
• Predicting potential respondents' decision to participate in web surveys; 2012; Fang, J., Wen, C.
• Comparing Ranking Techniques in Web Surveys; 2012; Blasius, J.
• Design of CAWI Instruments for Social Surveys ; 2012; Blanke, K.
• Web Survey Software; 2012; Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V., Slavec, A.
• Surveying general population: What types of experiments are further needed?; 2012; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N.
• Psychometric properties of an internet administered version of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability...; 2012; Vesteinsdottir, V., Reips, U.-D., Joinson, A. N., Porsdottir, F.
• Enhancing Web Surveys With New HTML5 Input Types; 2012; Funke, F.
• Mobile Survey Participation Rates in Commercial Market Research: A Meta-Analysis; 2012; Bosnjak, M., Poggio, T., Becker, K. R., Funke, F., Wachenfeld, A., Fischer, B.
• Research design for studying online communities with web surveys; 2012; Petrovcic, A., Petric, G., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• “What a waste of time!” vs “Why not participate?” On sentiments by business...; 2012; Torres van Grinsven, V., Snijkers, G., Daas, P.
• Case study: Respondent perspective on survey response; 2012; Jarrett, C.
• Effect of different stimulus on data quality in online panels; 2012; Zagar, S., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• The German Internet Panel: First Results from the Recruitment Phases; 2012; Blom, A. G.
• Panel retention rate and data quality: experimental results drawing on Reciprocity design; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
• Analysis of coverage bias for the implementation of web surveys in Spain; 2012; de Pedraza, P., Serrano, F.
• Web panels in Slovenia; 2012; Lenar, J., Vehovar, V.

Page:

• 1
...
• 31
• 32
• 33
...
• 82